How To Be Kind To The Environment and Save Money at the Same Time

Recently it has become clear that it is more important to do whatever you can to reduce your carbon emissions and save energy in a constant effort to be conscious of an overall environmental impact. However, you don’t have to break the bank while you save the environment. In fact, there are actually some things that you can do to save the environment and save money, too!

Your efforts can start by simply stopping into a vintage clothing store. Clothes require a lot of energy during the process of their creation. Therefore, shopping for secondhand clothes cuts down on the amount of energy that you are indirectly using when you buy things off the rack. Not to mention, with a bit of effort and creativity, you can use secondhand finds to create a style that’s all your own, usually at a much lower cost than if the clothes were new.

If you’re the type that likes to invest your money in order to enjoy future gains, consider investing in companies that have demonstrated a commitment to creating sustainable living and other environmentally friendly practices.

Finally, see if your local area offers a produce cooperative. This would allow you to purchase locally grown produce on a payment plan that is usually very cost effective. However, since the types of produce received will largely depend on the type of produce that happens to be in season, you may have to learn how to cook vegetables that you might not have ordinarily purchased if you were just shopping at the grocery store. However, if you are serious about making an environmental impact in your local area, the act of joining a produce cooperative allows you to support the livelihood of farmers who operate out of small establishments that are often very environmentally friendly.

Geothermal Impact: Environment

The Nesjavellir Geothermal Power Plant in Þing...
Image via Wikipedia

It is an undeniable truth that no cause is without its concerns; just as no cause is without its triumphs. Necessity is both tragic and craved, with its demands always leaving someone wanting more. And the search of green energy has been faced with the same complications – to ensure the future of the environment sacrifices must be made in the present; and these have led to constant debates and compromises. The only agreement to be found is the lack of one, and every method proposed is scrutinized for its potential harms and comforts.

Geothermal energy is one such method and it has been studied carefully within the decades. Its potentials are immense but its worries are problematic. And deciphering whether it is worthy of the environment has been a source of great discussion. The impact must be decided and its effects must be understood. There is more to this than simply siphoning heat from the earth, choosing the proper locations. There is instead a series of the good, the bad and the unsure.

Geothermal Advantages: unlike many green methods, this choice does not require massive amounts of land or water. It is not dependent on destroying acres for the sake of saving them in the future. It can instead be kept to a small section, unobtrusive. Also its generators (if properly maintained) are capable of absorbing pollutants, leading it to reduce the amount of carbon within the air. It draws its power from the center of the earth and does not require much from the surface.

Geothermal Disadvantages: while the heat that is found beneath the soil is able to generate power, it can also be the cause of poison emission. Gases will rise and enter the air, allowing elements like arsenic and mercury to appear. Excessive drilling can also cause tremors and minor earthquakes, leading to unstable ecosystems and potential dangers.

The environment is to be spared the common uses of coal and carbon. Geothermal energy, however, must be considered in its totality to decide whether it can best do that.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Is Measuring Scope 3 Emissions Really Worth It?

Warmth for Helsinki, Warmth for the planet
Image by melancholic optimist via Flickr

Perhaps you’ve heard that a few environmental groups are looking beyond the “direct emissions” level of your business’s total carbon footprint. The direct emissions of your operation and the level of emissions necessary to produce the power you use can be very substantial indeed. But they are not the be all end all of how many greenhouse gases your business produces. Since nearly all businesses perform similar, often parallel operations within an industry (and many that form a daisy chain of unrelated but interconnected industries), the results of greenhouse gas emissions tests can reveal a lot about how efficiently your company is run, in relation to its peers. And since we all share a biosphere that is under potential threat from these gases, it behooves everyone to consider their actions and their consequences.

Direct consumption of fossil fuels is known as Scope 1 emissions – those are obvious. How many fossil fuels do you put into your various tanks, in order to make your business run. And Scope 2 emissions are also fairly obvious – the power you use that is produced by fossil fuels, and how many emissions you cause via gas heating and whatnot. But a new concept has gained ground. Known as Scope 3 emissions, these measure every possible connection between your business and the use of fossil fuels. While this may in fact account for 75% of more of the greenhouse gases emitted in all business operations, the fact is that a lot of businesses are taking a “wait and see” approach to this new potential standard.

After all, is a company really responsible for how many greenhouse gases its suppliers use, in producing the raw materials that it might need? And is a company actually accountable for the greenhouse gases that its employees use in their daily commute to and from work? How about from when those same employees go out of town on business trips? What level of accountability should a company have for the ultimate direction its products physically take? Eventually a product requires greenhouse gases to dispose of it, after all.