Environmental Definitions: Passive Solar

Moody sun burst hovering over a trough at Kram...
Image via Wikipedia

Conservation is a cause shared throughout the world – land must be protected; water consumption must reduced; and once abundant resources must now be offered sparingly. The assumption that all energies will remain (able to be used when wanted, able to be found in excess) no longer exists. Thoughts instead turn toward the future, where all elements will surely be taken in necessity and nothing more, where there will be no worthy environment. And such thoughts have forced new methods to arise, hoping to find sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels and their emissions.

One such method is Passive Solar Technologies.

As its name implies, Passive Solar Technologies is the utilization of sunlight without the aid of extra machinery. Simply explained: this form of sustainable energy allows panels to gather rays and then filter them into the connected network of heat sources – such as boilers, lighting and more. These heat sources do not use fans, cooling pumps or similar components to circulate themselves. They are instead devoted purely to the sun.

And this is what marks them truly sustainable (unlike their more technology reliant counters in Active Solar Technologies). There is no demand for external energies and their potential problems, such as: carbon releases, higher costs and waste creating materials. Everything is instead supplied by the sun and nothing more.

For some, however, this environmental triumph may prove to be a challenge. Unlike Active Solar Technologies, which can fuel the entire home, Passive is more limiting. Its processes tend to be reserved for only the essential tasks and excessive energy is not possible. It also requires green building techniques to ensure that all panels are placed in the most ideal locations. This can be problematic for those without an abundance of choices for their home.

Passive Technologies still remain a viable option, though, and should be considered. Their impact on the earth is meager and their abilities are commendable.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Filed Under: Land Grants Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

The Environment Changing: Sustainable Energy

let's all move to vermont!
Image by JKönig via Flickr

There is a fear among the masses – one of future failures and energy lost. The notion of channeling the environment into friendlier currents has swept across the world, with countless companies reinventing their efforts and finding alternatives to coal. But such alternatives, many argue, will not maintain themselves for the days to come. They are fashionably green but ultimately impractical; and they will only offer damaging concerns for the many generations to follow our own. They cannot last. They cannot withstand the demands of cities. They will instead collapse beneath the weight of their own promises, leaving many to scramble after.

And it because of this that sustainable energy has become the new ideal.

Explained without a tangle of technicalities and jargon: sustainable energy is the use of elements that will not impact the environment negatively but will also not force future civilizations to be without their needed power. To ease the burden of coal and carbon is necessary, but so is the assurance that these methods will last. Resources must be without fail. They cannot be hoarded, given sparingly and to the highest bidder. The energy must instead be able to be shared and sure: sustainable.

And it is this need that has driven many individuals to improve the aptly named green methods. All of the resources must not only reduce emissions and provide cleaner air, but they must also be constant. And research has been offered to the common choices of turbines, solar panels and geothermal generators. These have been adapted from their once limited abilities, able now to aid more than individual home or meager avenues. They have been improved.

This is essential.

Sustainable energy is a cause now championed by many. The intention is not to ignore the needs of the environment. It is instead to tame those needs to a modern purpose. Land is to be tailored to better intentions. Science and sun are in unison – and the results are promising.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Filed Under: Environment, Land Grants Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

Green Energy: The Environment Redefined

Wind turbines (Vendsyssel, Denmark, 2004)
Image via Wikipedia

The world is changing – the once accepted reliance on carbon spewing machines has been replaced to a collective awareness. Individuals now demand their air to be without the smoke and stratus dangers. The miles are to be empty, clean, and philosophies are without their former disdain for the refusal of seemingly easy coal. The environment is now to be saved, not simply ravaged and left for future generations to heal. It is instead to be protected through endless campaigns and contingencies; one of which has become the rallying cry across continents: green energy.

Simply defined, green energy is the use of environment friendly alternatives to generate the needed power. Elements like solar panels, wind turbines and tidal turns are used to create electricity – allowing it to be without the usual complications of emissions or damning poisons. These elements can offer the same strength of currents as their coal counterparts and yet allow a company’s (or home’s) impact on nature be minimized.

There are some that would argue the efficiency of green energy, however. Wishing to save the environment is an important cause, they claim, but it cannot be done at the expense of modern needs. Progress will be ended with the use of these methods, with all efforts given to the protection of botanicals and to not the necessity of cities: this is the common complaint, offered daily and vehemently.

It is as unfounded as it is loud.

Green energy is not a proof of dwindling progress. It is instead the reinvention of it. Using the environment to tame the use of coal and similar options ensures that the generations to come will not be forced to turn all focus to combating the effects of today. Their attentions can instead be given to new ideas and new potentials – not to seeking ways to eliminate the constant haze. It is an assurance of the future and an aid to the present.

The use of green energy will not be a quick transition but it is an inevitable one. Its worth has been proven.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Filed Under: Environment, Land Grants Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

The Difference Learned: Energy and Environment

© Guerito 2005
Image via Wikipedia

It’s become an easy thing, exchanging names and principles, believing all philosophies to be the same. The environment is to be championed and all energy alternatives (those new ideals, spanning generations and industry) are assumed to be identical. The notion of green efficiency is given a broad definition, with its many subtleties forgotten and its many purposes ignored. Individuals think it all to be simply one movement. They care little for the distinctions found within it, concerned only for how it effects the development of their land. But those distinctions are vital in how the world begins to approach its progress. They must be learned. They must be understood.

When considering new methods, the argument always returns to green energy and sustainable energy. But too often these are thought to be the same, the terms tossed about with little care. These concepts, while dependent on each other, are not direct copies, however. They are separate meanings and must be addressed as such.

Green Energy: encompassing the spirit of the environmental movement, green energy is the use of methods that don’t offer the typical pollutants or dangers. Their purpose is to lessen the impact of companies and consumers, alleviating the carbon waste left behind. This expression can be given to anything that is efficient. It is broad in its scope and its intentions. It is not, however, always able to be sustained. Some attempts may only prove momentary or untested.

Sustainable Energy: ensuring that the foundations of the safer philosophies are upheld, sustainable energy seeks to use only those environment friendly alternatives that can last for the years to come. Nuclear fission, turbines and water generators are utilized; each with the intention of remaining constant. And, while this is often confused with green energy, it is not the same – it is instead proven. It is less experimental and does not include the merely renewable components.

The distinction is small but vital; the purposes are linked but not without difference; and the environment relies on both of these methods to endure.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Filed Under: Environment, Land Grants Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

Geothermal Impact: Environment

The Nesjavellir Geothermal Power Plant in Þing...
Image via Wikipedia

It is an undeniable truth that no cause is without its concerns; just as no cause is without its triumphs. Necessity is both tragic and craved, with its demands always leaving someone wanting more. And the search of green energy has been faced with the same complications – to ensure the future of the environment sacrifices must be made in the present; and these have led to constant debates and compromises. The only agreement to be found is the lack of one, and every method proposed is scrutinized for its potential harms and comforts.

Geothermal energy is one such method and it has been studied carefully within the decades. Its potentials are immense but its worries are problematic. And deciphering whether it is worthy of the environment has been a source of great discussion. The impact must be decided and its effects must be understood. There is more to this than simply siphoning heat from the earth, choosing the proper locations. There is instead a series of the good, the bad and the unsure.

Geothermal Advantages: unlike many green methods, this choice does not require massive amounts of land or water. It is not dependent on destroying acres for the sake of saving them in the future. It can instead be kept to a small section, unobtrusive. Also its generators (if properly maintained) are capable of absorbing pollutants, leading it to reduce the amount of carbon within the air. It draws its power from the center of the earth and does not require much from the surface.

Geothermal Disadvantages: while the heat that is found beneath the soil is able to generate power, it can also be the cause of poison emission. Gases will rise and enter the air, allowing elements like arsenic and mercury to appear. Excessive drilling can also cause tremors and minor earthquakes, leading to unstable ecosystems and potential dangers.

The environment is to be spared the common uses of coal and carbon. Geothermal energy, however, must be considered in its totality to decide whether it can best do that.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Filed Under: Environment, Land Grants Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

Power Doesn’t Need Fossil Fuels

Coal, one of the fossil fuels.
Image via Wikipedia

Do you use electricity? Unless you run a very old fashioned business that does everything by hand, and probably operates in a third world country, you most likely use electricity on a regular basis. Matter of fact, that was a silly question, considering the fact that you’re able to read this right now. The point is, electricity is everything, and impacts just about everything we do in the modern world. What most people don’t think about, however, is the fact that most of the electricity generated in this world comes out of some kind of fossil fuel burning plant. Either through coal, natural gas or oil, fossil fuels drive most of the world’s power production facilities.

The interesting thing is, a lot of power companies are doing much better nowadays. For one thing, there are a host of different initiatives being endlessly debated on Capitol Hill, regarding providing government funding to start-up business ventures that produce clean energy. While this is mostly just politicians talking because they love the sound of their own voices, some of it will make it past the “we should do this” phase of things, and into actual production. Sooner or later, the world is going to catch on to the fact that one need not burn a non-renewable resource, in order to extract energy from it.

There are a host of different power companies which offer services such as the Green Power Program. With this program, a household can elect to receive a portion of their electricity (denoted in preset increments, all the way up to 100%) from renewable resources such as methane out of garbage landfills and wind power out of parts of the country where it can be easily harvested and turned into power. Overall, these kinds of electricity are the salt of the Earth, because they allow you (and your business) to use the same amount of power, with an essentially zero Scope 2 carbon footprint to be concerned (and additionally taxed) over. Since the option to employ this is so readily available, it only makes sense that people should use it.

Filed Under: Environment Tagged With: , , ,